Forum

There is no compelling reason for most photographers to acquire the D7500 when there are better solutions available. I believe it would; but, they may choose to hobble the camera by using the old 51-point AF system or a low frame rate in order to keep consumers from purchasing the D5. If they proceeded in the same manner that they did with the D3 and D700, there would be no demand for the D5. The 16MP D4 sensor is fantastic; it has a high enough resolution to capture a great deal of information while still allowing for some cropping. The same way that someone shooting with a crop sensor inside shouldn't be using one in the first place, so should you.  
Off center, the D7500 still seems to be rather accurate to me. When it comes to purchasing an interchangeable lens camera, the number of lenses offered is a major deciding factor. Because both the Nikon D7500 and the Nikon D500 use the same Nikon F lens mount, there are presently 316 native lenses available for use with these cameras. This article will compare the Nikon D7500 and D500, two Advanced DSLR cameras with a high level of performance. Earlier this year, the Nikon D7500 was presented on the market, while the Nikon D500 was debuted in January 2016.  
In terms of viewfinder coverage, both cameras offer 100 percent coverage, although the viewfinder on the D500 will seem bigger in comparison. A second difference between the D500 and the D7500 is that the D500 has two memory card slots – one ultra fast XQD memory card slot and one UHS-II compliant SD slot, but the D7500 only has a single UHS-I SD memory card slot. Also same on all cameras is the EXPEED 5 image processor, which works in conjunction with the metering sensor to provide accurate metering. Losing basic ISO performance is a significant step down, particularly considering that DX bodies are more likely than FX bodies to be used outside in bright light. The loss of support for AI/AI-S lenses is a big concern for the kind of individuals that purchase cameras in the D7x00 group.  
Both cameras also include a separate external microphone input, a headphone jack for monitoring, and an HDMI output for recording uncompressed video to an external device, all of which contribute to increased video quality. Both cameras are comfortable to hold in the hand from an ergonomic standpoint. There are some design similarities between both, such as the usage of a separate ISO button directly beneath the shutter release, and they also handle well, with a deep and comfortable grip. Both phones include a 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen LCD on the back, while the D500 has a higher resolution of 2359K dots compared to the D500's 922K dots.  
  
Another consideration is weight, which is particularly significant when choosing a camera that you will be carrying about with you all day. The Nikon D7500 is substantially lighter than the Nikon D500, which may prove to be a considerable benefit on lengthy walking expeditions, particularly in hot climates. The top view comparison of the Nikon D7500 and the Nikon D500 is now available for your viewing pleasure. I simply don't bother messing with the settings any more and shoot in raw. The parameters I alter, such as ISO or FX/DX, are controlled by hard buttons.  
Nasim Mansurov is the author and creator of Photography Life, which is situated in Denver, Colorado. He lives in Denver with his family. He is widely regarded as one of the most influential instructors in the photography profession, having conducted seminars, produced instructional films, and written several articles for Photography Life magazine. Although it is not a significant difference for me, it does make it more fun to study photographs on the LCD screen when necessary.  
In this section, we'll go through the many specifications, design characteristics, and pricing points of both of these Nikon cameras. Of course, one of the most significant distinctions between the two cameras is their respective prices. For those willing to forego some of the additional capabilities of the D500, the D7500 will be offered at a substantial cost savings over the previous model.  
  
Both of the cameras are weather-sealed, which is excellent news for those who like to photograph outside. However, there are some significant variations between the two cameras, and they begin with the magnification of the viewfinder. The Nikon D500 features a very outstanding 1.0x viewfinder magnification, whilst the Nikon D7500 has a much more restricted 0.94x viewfinder magnification.  
The interruption of metering will be a major nuisance. Robin - Thank you for your time. Because, as you point out, it is a shutter function, the burst rate/frame rate is not initially impacted by the resolution of the camera. The SUSTAINED burst rate, on the other hand, is impacted since the buffer fills up more quickly when the sensor is bigger, and this seems to have an impact on the processing of the shutter actuation signals. It has more to do with the mindset of the maker than anything else.  
In contrast to the D7200, the D7500 is unable to accommodate a Nikon battery grip. DXO Mark has published information on sensor performance for a large number of cameras. Color depth ("DXO Portrait"), dynamic range ("DXO Landscape"), and low-light sensitivity ("DXO Sports") of camera sensors are all evaluated and scored by this service. An overall camera score is also published by this service.  
This month, Panasonic released the Lumix S 35mm F1.8, the newest in a line of full frame prime lenses for cameras using the Leica / Panasonic / Sigma L-mount system. The lens is Viltrox's first autofocus lens for Canon's array of RF mount mirrorless cameras, and it is available now. The Ricoh GR IIIx and the original Ricoh GR III are so close in appearance that it may be difficult to tell them apart.  
When it comes to the resolution loss, I'm still a little perplexed, even though I understand that the linear resolution is just a few percent lower, and when you're producing large prints, every little bit helps. Nbrooksphoto - Photograph by Nbrooks However, according to what I've read, the D5's sensor has a low base ISO dynamic range and is essentially non-ISO-invariant, similar to Canon's earlier sensors. It would have excellent low-light performance and picture quality if it were housed in a slower body; they could use the same autofocus system, but I believe that would place it too close to the D5.